Crypto theft volumes fluctuate significantly month to month, driven by the size and frequency of protocol-level exploits. February produced a notably different picture — not just in scale, but in the methods attackers chose.
According to the report, roughly $49 million was lost to crypto-related exploits in February, down sharply from the $385 million stolen in January. A single breach involving Step Finance, a portfolio dashboard and analytics platform built on the Solana blockchain, accounted for approximately $30 million of that total. Separate estimates from blockchain security firm PeckShield placed February losses even lower, at $26.5 million — which it described as the lowest monthly figure since March 2025, attributing the decline partly to stronger risk controls across the industry.
The more significant development, however, is not the dollar figure but where the damage came from. Social engineering attacks caused more cumulative harm than traditional smart contract exploits during the month. Phishing campaigns increased sharply, typically tricking users into clicking malicious links or signing fraudulent transactions. The dominant technique was authorization abuse — victims unknowingly granting wallet permissions that allowed attackers to move funds directly from their accounts. Private individuals were the most frequent targets, not centralized exchanges or decentralized finance protocols.
Detection Improves, Exposure Remains
The shift toward exploiting human behavior rather than code vulnerabilities reflects a broader adaptation by bad actors as protocol-level defenses become harder to breach. Bybit reported that its fraud-prevention system blocked more than $300 million in unauthorized withdrawals during the final quarter of last year, flagging roughly 350 high-risk fraud addresses and preventing around 8,000 users from falling victim to potential scams.
Those figures illustrate both the scale of attempted theft and the expanding capacity of platforms to intercept it. Still, one month of reduced losses does not confirm a durable improvement. The data from Chainalysis places the broader problem in context: crypto hacks resulted in $3.4 billion in cumulative losses last year. Losses peaked in 2022 but have remained elevated, and large-scale attacks continue to represent a material risk even as detection systems improve.
What the Data Signals
The February numbers suggest that when protocol-level exploits are less frequent, the overall loss figure drops considerably — but that phishing and wallet-permission abuse fill the gap at a lower, steadier volume. The attack surface has shifted toward end users, where technical defenses are harder to enforce uniformly and where social engineering can bypass even well-audited contracts entirely.
Whether February’s figures represent a temporary lull or the beginning of a more sustained decline in large-scale exploits will depend on activity in the months ahead. What the data does confirm is that the threat profile for individual crypto users is becoming more acute relative to the threat targeting protocols directly.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.
Photo by Pixabay
This article is a curated summary based on third-party sources. Source: Read the original article